Current:Home > NewsJury orders NFL to pay nearly $4.8 billion in ‘Sunday Ticket’ case for violating antitrust laws -NextFrontier Finance
Jury orders NFL to pay nearly $4.8 billion in ‘Sunday Ticket’ case for violating antitrust laws
View
Date:2025-04-17 15:46:08
LOS ANGELES (AP) — A jury in U.S. District Court ordered the NFL to pay nearly $4.8 billion in damages Thursday after ruling that the league violated antitrust laws in distributing out-of-market Sunday afternoon games on a premium subscription service.
The jury awarded $4.7 billion in damages to the residential class and $96 million in damages to the commercial class.
The lawsuit covered 2.4 million residential subscribers and 48,000 businesses who paid for the package of out-of-market games from the 2011 through 2022 seasons on DirecTV. The lawsuit claimed the league broke antitrust laws by selling its package of Sunday games at an inflated price. The subscribers also say the league restricted competition by offering “Sunday Ticket” only on a satellite provider.
The NFL said it would appeal the verdict. That appeal would go to the 9th Circuit and then possibly the Supreme Court.
“We are disappointed with the jury’s verdict today in the NFL Sunday Ticket class action lawsuit,” the league said in a statement. “We continue to believe that our media distribution strategy, which features all NFL games broadcast on free over-the-air television in the markets of the participating teams and national distribution of our most popular games, supplemented by many additional choices including RedZone, Sunday Ticket and NFL+, is by far the most fan friendly distribution model in all of sports and entertainment.
“We will certainly contest this decision as we believe that the class action claims in this case are baseless and without merit.”
The jury of five men and three women deliberated for nearly five hours before reaching its decision.
“This case transcends football. This case matters,” plaintiffs attorney Bill Carmody said during Wednesday’s closing arguments. “It’s about justice. It’s about telling the 32 team owners who collectively own all the big TV rights, the most popular content in the history of TV — that’s what they have. It’s about telling them that even you cannot ignore the antitrust laws. Even you cannot collude to overcharge consumers. Even you can’t hide the truth and think you’re going to get away with it.”
The league maintained it has the right to sell “Sunday Ticket” under its antitrust exemption for broadcasting. The plaintiffs say that only covers over-the-air broadcasts and not pay TV.
DirecTV had “Sunday Ticket” from its inception in 1994 through 2022. The league signed a seven-year deal with Google’s YouTube TV that began with the 2023 season.
The lawsuit was originally filed in 2015 by the Mucky Duck sports bar in San Francisco but was dismissed in 2017. Two years later, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which has jurisdiction over California and eight other states, reinstated the case. Gutierrez ruled last year the case could proceed as a class action.
___
AP NFL: https://apnews.com/hub/nfl
veryGood! (6)
Related
- 'Most Whopper
- House Republicans hope their debt limit bill will get Biden to the negotiating table
- There's No Crying Over These Secrets About A League of Their Own
- Twitter removes all labels about government ties from NPR and other outlets
- How to watch the 'Blue Bloods' Season 14 finale: Final episode premiere date, cast
- Championing Its Heritage, Canada Inches Toward Its Goal of Planting 2 Billion Trees
- Amy Schumer Crashes Joy Ride Cast's Press Junket in the Most Epic Way
- Contact is lost with a Japanese spacecraft attempting to land on the moon
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- California becomes the first state to adopt emission rules for trains
Ranking
- 2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
- Amazon Reviewers Keep Coming Back to Shop These Cute, Comfy & On-Sale Summer Pants
- Inside Clean Energy: Here’s What the 2021 Elections Tell Us About the Politics of Clean Energy
- Inside Clean Energy: Batteries Got Cheaper in 2021. So How Close Are We to EVs That Cost Less than Gasoline Vehicles?
- NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
- Inside Hilarie Burton and Jeffrey Dean Morgan's Incredibly Private Marriage
- Love Island’s Ekin-Su Cülcüloğlu and Davide Sanclimenti Break Up
- Pete Davidson’s New Purchase Proves He’s Already Thinking About Future Kids
Recommendation
Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
At Global Energy Conference, Oil and Gas Industry Leaders Argue For Fossil Fuels’ Future in the Energy Transition
From Spring to Fall, New York Harbor Is a Feeding Ground for Bottlenose Dolphins, a New Study Reveals
Inside Clean Energy: How Should We Account for Emerging Technologies in the Push for Net-Zero?
Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
California becomes the first state to adopt emission rules for trains
Warming Trends: Weather Guarantees for Your Vacation, Plus the Benefits of Microbial Proteins and an Urban Bias Against the Environment
New Federal Anti-SLAPP Legislation Would Protect Activists and Whistleblowers From Abusive Lawsuits
Like
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
- Warming Trends: Weather Guarantees for Your Vacation, Plus the Benefits of Microbial Proteins and an Urban Bias Against the Environment
- California Considers ‘Carbon Farming’ As a Potential Climate Solution. Ardent Proponents, and Skeptics, Abound